Large image files
A single unoptimized hero image can be heavier than all your JavaScript combined, and it usually sits right in the critical path as the LCP element — so a fat image directly slows the metric Google measures your loading speed on. On mobile data it’s money out of the user’s pocket. AI-built pages routinely embed full-resolution PNGs and un-compressed exports.
Symptoms
How VibeCheck catches it
In your widget · Problems
To your coding agent · MCP
The same string in your widget and in your agent’s context — no screenshot, no copy-paste.
Root causes
The fix
Compress and re-encode heavy images to WebP or AVIF (typically 30–80% smaller than PNG/JPEG at the same quality), resize them to no more than 2× their displayed dimensions, and ideally serve them through an image CDN that negotiates format and size per request. Use <picture> to offer AVIF with fallbacks.
- Resize the source to at most 2× the size it’s displayed at
- Re-encode to AVIF/WebP with a quality around 75–80
- Serve via
<picture>with fallbacks, or through an image CDN
<picture>
<source type="image/avif" srcset="/hero.avif" />
<source type="image/webp" srcset="/hero.webp" />
<img src="/hero.jpg" width="800" height="450" alt="Hero" />
</picture>npx sharp-cli -i hero.png -o hero.avif --avif quality=75FAQ
- What image size is acceptable?
- Aim to keep individual images well under 200KB where you can. VibeCheck warns at 500KB and errors at 1MB — past that you’re almost certainly serving an un-resized or un-compressed original.
- AVIF or WebP?
- AVIF compresses better but encodes slower and has slightly less universal support; WebP is faster and near-universal. Offer AVIF first with a WebP (then JPEG) fallback via
<picture>, and you get the best of both. - Does this affect SEO?
- Yes, indirectly — a heavy hero image usually is your LCP element, and LCP is a Core Web Vital Google uses in ranking. Lighter images mean a faster LCP and a better page-experience signal.